大哉心乎
It's been a trend lately to have self-service udon with generous toppings, but when I think back to udon chain restaurants from a decade ago, for me it was always "Tokutoku Udon". I haven't been there in years, but I found myself in the Arashiyama area on a Saturday afternoon and decided to give it a try after a long time. The restaurant had both table and tatami seating, with a considerable number of seats. We arrived around 11:40 am, and already about 80% of the seats were taken, showing how popular it still is. Looking at the menu on the table, the prices seemed a bit higher compared to the self-service udon places, but the old system of being able to choose the amount of udon from single, semi-double (1.5 servings), double, or triple for the same price was still in place, showing that Tokutoku Udon's unique selling point is still alive. I ordered the Java-style curry udon for 800 yen (excluding tax). While you could get up to a double serving for the same price, I wasn't very hungry so I opted for a single serving. The Java-style curry udon looked somewhat plain at first glance, lacking a bit of vibrancy. It had a spicy curry broth with a tangy and juicy flavor. The rich taste, with plenty of beef slices, made me think I'd like to try it with curry rice as well. As far as curry udon broths go, it was quite tasty. The udon noodles were medium thickness, giving off a handmade Sanuki udon-like chewiness. They didn't break apart easily when combined with the curry broth, indicating their strong elasticity. The wheat flavor was also distinct, blending well with the bold curry broth. The taste of the curry udon was good, but the feeling of being a bit overpriced remained. Perhaps it was because I had a single serving, but the service of being able to get up to 3 servings for the same price is now also offered at self-service Hananokawa Seimen, so the uniqueness is no longer there, and I couldn't find any new features unique to Tokutoku Udon. I couldn't help but feel like "Is this really worth 800 yen?" In that case, I thought I'd rather go to Marugame Seimen nearby. However, judging by the number of customers, it seems that not everyone feels the same way. Another disappointment was that they only accepted cash for payment. In a time where various cashless payments are becoming more common, and with the decrease in handling cash due to the pandemic, sticking to cash-only payments, regardless of the reasons, felt like a significant delay for a chain restaurant. Thank you for the meal.

